|
|
Post by Altl on Jan 27, 2007 19:52:32 GMT -5
 For the record this is a brontosaurus. |
|
|
|
Post by Draxas on Jan 27, 2007 21:37:50 GMT -5
That's impossible; the brontosaurus does not, and never did, exist. Palentologists have determined that their brontosaurus skeletons were actually mishmashes of parts from various other dinosaurs.
Also, for the record, I think my eyes are bleeding from that drawing. It is a nice hat, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Altl on Jan 27, 2007 21:55:16 GMT -5
That's impossible; the brontosaurus does not, and never did, exist. Palentologists have determined that their brontosaurus skeletons were actually mishmashes of parts from various other dinosaurs. Yeah, next you'll be telling me Garth Brooks and Chris Gaines are actually the same person. He is wearing the hat to protect his head from asteroids. |
|
|
|
Post by Draxas on Jan 27, 2007 22:18:51 GMT -5
Yeah, next you'll be telling me Garth Brooks and Chris Gaines are actually the same person. And why would I dash your youthful gullibility againt the pointy rocks of reality that way? ... Well, because I can, really. You might want to take this one up in the gossip thread if you want the real truth about Brooks and Gaines. He's a pretty smart not-a-brontosaurus, then. |
|
|
|
Post by N3B on Jan 29, 2007 1:02:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Draxas on Jan 29, 2007 3:18:57 GMT -5
Dude, that not-a-brontosaurus is so dead.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ranger on Jan 29, 2007 6:15:19 GMT -5
That's impossible; the brontosaurus does not, and never did, exist. Palentologists have determined that their brontosaurus skeletons were actually mishmashes of parts from various other dinosaurs. I demand proof >_> |
|
|
|
Post by N3B on Jan 29, 2007 7:26:06 GMT -5
Either way, a brontosaurus is an established being, similar to a leprechaun or a unicorn. Everyone knows what it is regardless of whether or not it's real.
|
|
|
|
Post by Altl on Jan 29, 2007 14:54:22 GMT -5
I feel the Unicorn in that picture is not being malicious, it is merely trying to help the brontosaurus by knocking it out of the way. Unfortunately it forgot that unicorns have horns and as a results its going to hurt the brontosaurus rather than help it. Its sad really...  Either way, a brontosaurus is an established being, similar to a leprechaun or a unicorn. Everyone knows what it is regardless of whether or not it's real. Quoted for Truth. |
|
|
|
Post by Draxas on Jan 30, 2007 1:14:35 GMT -5
Just because you feel that a brontosaurus exists deep down in your gut, doesn't make it the truth.
Unless you're dealing with the Colbert Report, anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by N3B on Jan 30, 2007 2:21:49 GMT -5
It's not that I/we think it exists, but that we can associate an image and story/history with one when we hear the word brontosaurus, just like we can associate an image and story/history with leprechauns and unicorns, and even dragons. Certainly they're not real, but that doesn't stop them from having their own entity of intangible existence.
|
|
|
|
Post by Draxas on Jan 31, 2007 0:36:53 GMT -5
Congratulations! You're the winner of Semantics Battle 2007!
|
|
|
|
Post by Altl on Jan 31, 2007 14:47:10 GMT -5
Does that mean we can finally start Schematics Battle 2007?
|
|
|
|
Post by Draxas on Jan 31, 2007 19:21:51 GMT -5
If you insist.
|
|
|
|
Post by Altl on Feb 1, 2007 14:29:58 GMT -5
|
|
